266dee564f
Consider the following transaction:
2010-06-22 Sample
Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30}
Assets:Brokerage
Previously, this would have been equivalent to:
2010-06-22 Sample
Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL @ $30
Assets:Brokerage
However, this is not always what the user expects to happen. When @ is
not being used, the transaction should reflect a mere transfer of
commodities. This is now how it works, and thus the above transaction
is now equivalent to the following instead:
2010-06-22 Sample
Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30}
Assets:Brokerage -10 AAPL {$30}
25 lines
784 B
Text
25 lines
784 B
Text
reg --format '%(justify(scrub(total_expr), 40, 40, true))\n' --lots
|
|
<<<
|
|
D 1.0000s
|
|
|
|
2006/03/14 Opening Balances
|
|
Assets:Tajer 1339829c @ 1.86590975416s
|
|
Assets:Gruulmorg 248720c @ 10.051463493s
|
|
Equity:Gold -5000000s
|
|
>>>1
|
|
1339829c {1.86590975416s} [2006/03/14]
|
|
1339829c {1.86590975416s} [2006/03/14]
|
|
248720c {10.051463493s} [2006/03/14]
|
|
1339829c {1.86590975416s} [2006/03/14]
|
|
248720c {10.051463493s} [2006/03/14]
|
|
-1388.9h
|
|
>>>2
|
|
=== 0
|
|
reg --format '%(justify(scrub(total_expr), 40, 40, true))\n' --lots-actual
|
|
>>>1
|
|
1339829c
|
|
1588549c
|
|
1588549c
|
|
-1388.9h
|
|
>>>2
|
|
=== 0
|