Added two comments, to remind myself to check something.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdcd52dbaf
commit
aea84dd9c5
2 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ namespace {
|
|||
report_t& report(find_scope<report_t>(args));
|
||||
item_t& item(find_scope<item_t>(args));
|
||||
|
||||
// jww (2009-02-06): Should we be calling reported_date here?
|
||||
|
||||
date_t when;
|
||||
if (report.HANDLED(effective)) {
|
||||
if (optional<date_t> date = item.effective_date())
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ namespace ledger {
|
|||
|
||||
date_t xact_t::date() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
// jww (2009-02-06): Why isn't reported_date called here?
|
||||
if (! _date) {
|
||||
assert(entry);
|
||||
return entry->date();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue