Fix @node pointer errors

Unfortunately, you cannot reliably use periods, commas, or colons within
a node name; these can confuse the Info reader.
This commit is contained in:
Jamie Nguyen 2014-04-27 19:15:15 +01:00
parent 04d147c9a7
commit 507fac7e50

View file

@ -2693,7 +2693,7 @@ doing it.
* Total posting costs::
* Virtual posting costs::
* Commodity prices::
* Prices vs. costs::
* Prices versus costs::
* Fixated prices and costs::
* Lot dates::
* Lot notes::
@ -3296,7 +3296,7 @@ happening in the case of an exceptional transaction, surround the
Income:Gifts Received
@end smallexample
@node Commodity prices, Prices vs. costs, Virtual posting costs, Transactions
@node Commodity prices, Prices versus costs, Virtual posting costs, Transactions
@section Commodity prices
@findex --lot-prices
@ -3424,8 +3424,8 @@ And in cases where the amounts do not divide into whole figures and
must be rounded, the capital gains figure could be off by a cent. Use
with caution.
@node Prices vs. costs, Fixated prices and costs, Commodity prices, Transactions
@section Prices vs. costs
@node Prices versus costs, Fixated prices and costs, Commodity prices, Transactions
@section Prices versus costs
Because lot pricing provides enough information to infer the cost, the
following two transactions are equivalent:
@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ example in the print report. Functionally, however, there is no
difference, and neither the register nor the balance report are
sensitive to this difference.
@node Fixated prices and costs, Lot dates, Prices vs. costs, Transactions
@node Fixated prices and costs, Lot dates, Prices versus costs, Transactions
@section Fixated prices and costs
If you buy a stock last year, and ask for its value today, Ledger will
@ -3476,7 +3476,7 @@ fixated prices by way of the cost:
@end smallexample
This is the same as the previous transaction, with the same caveats
found in @ref{Prices vs. costs}.
found in @ref{Prices versus costs}.
@node Lot dates, Lot notes, Fixated prices and costs, Transactions
@section Lot dates
@ -8458,13 +8458,13 @@ make sense later.
@menu
* Basic data traversal::
* Raw vs. Cooked::
* Raw versus Cooked::
* Queries::
* Embedded Python::
* Amounts::
@end menu
@node Basic data traversal, Raw vs. Cooked, Extending with Python, Extending with Python
@node Basic data traversal, Raw versus Cooked, Extending with Python, Extending with Python
@section Basic data traversal
Every interaction with Ledger happens in the context of a Session.
@ -8491,8 +8491,8 @@ for xact in ledger.read_journal("sample.dat").xacts:
print "Transferring %s to/from %s" % (post.amount, post.account)
@end smallexample
@node Raw vs. Cooked, Queries, Basic data traversal, Extending with Python
@section Raw vs. Cooked
@node Raw versus Cooked, Queries, Basic data traversal, Extending with Python
@section Raw versus Cooked
Ledger data exists in one of two forms: raw and cooked. Raw objects are
what you get from a traversal like the above, and represent exactly what
@ -8556,7 +8556,7 @@ does it transaction-wise. It relies on the fact that an unsorted report
returns postings in the exact order they were parsed from the journal
file.
@node Queries, Embedded Python, Raw vs. Cooked, Extending with Python
@node Queries, Embedded Python, Raw versus Cooked, Extending with Python
@section Queries
The Journal.query() method accepts every argument you can specify on the